osoparavos.com

For readers of the Penguin editions who experience that Proust’s “The Prisoner” may feel easier to read and comprehend than the previous volumes. Why is that, and was that volume actually written before other volumes?

Yes—there are good reasons The Prisoner, (La Prisonnière) can feel surprisingly easier, and the chronology of its composition is genuinely confusing.

Why it may feel easier

I think the biggest difference is concentration. The earlier volumes continually change scale:

• Combray and childhood memory
• the Swanns
• Balbec and the young girls
• the Guermantes
• Parisian society
• Dreyfus, sexuality, art, social ambition, historical change

The Prisoner, by contrast, is extraordinarily enclosed. The narrator and Albertine are largely in the same Paris apartment, and the central problem—his attempt to possess, understand, and monitor her—keeps generating variations on the same psychological theme. The enormous social world of Guermantes and Sodome et Gomorrhe recedes.

That gives the book something closer to a novelistic plot: What is Albertine doing? What does the narrator know? What is she concealing? Will she leave? Can he trust her? Even when Proust goes off into one of his enormous digressions, you have a much clearer dramatic situation to return to.

There’s also a striking change in the narrator’s maturity. In the early books we’re often watching him discover the world—falling in love with names, places, people, social distinctions, art, etc. By The Prisoner, much of that machinery is already established. Proust can therefore work directly with the narrator’s obsessive analysis rather than continually introducing and explaining a new social world.

And, paradoxically, the claustrophobia makes Proust easier to follow. The book is psychologically complicated, but spatially and dramatically simple.

But was it written before the earlier volumes?

Partly—and this is the really interesting answer.

The seven-volume structure we know today is somewhat misleading. Proust did not write the books sequentially from Volume 1 through Volume 7 and then publish them in that order.

The material that eventually became The Prisoner and The Fugitive was being developed very early, during the period when Proust was working on the first volumes. The Albertine material goes back at least to the early 1910s; the name “Albertine,” for example, appears in his notebooks in 1913. 

The First World War then gave Proust an enormous interruption in publication—and an opportunity to expand and radically restructure the work. Swann’s Way appeared in 1913, but In the Shadow of Young Girls in Flower didn’t appear until 1919. During that interval Proust was extensively rewriting and expanding the novel. The later Albertine material grew enormously in the process. 

So there’s a sense in which the germ of The Prisoner is older than some of the material in the volumes that precede it, even though Proust continued revising The Prisoner much later.

In fact, Proust’s own organization of the material was different from our seven-volume arrangement. The Prisoner was originally conceived as part of Sodome et Gomorrhe III. The final typescript he sent to Gallimard shortly before his death was titled, in his own hand, La Prisonnière and identified as the “first part of Sodome et Gomorrhe III.” 

And there’s an even more astonishing point: Proust was still revising it almost until his death. The Society of Friends of Marcel Proust notes that he worked through three successive typescripts and was still correcting the text on November 6, 1922—only twelve days before he died. 

He died on November 18, 1922. The Prisoner was published in 1923, assembled by his brother Robert Proust and Jacques Rivière from the materials he left behind. 

So the paradox is:

The Prisoner is both very old and very late.

Its underlying material and conceptionreach back to the period when Proust was developing the earlier books, but Proust kept rewriting, expanding, relocating and recombining it for years. The version we read as Volume V is therefore not an early book that he simply put aside; it’s the product of a long process that continued right up to the end of his life.

And that may actually help explain your experience of its readability. By this point Proust had spent years working out what he wanted this particular psychological drama to be. The earlier books are partly the immense construction of the world that makes the Albertine drama possible. The Prisoner can then exploit that already-built world.

One especially useful way of thinking about the sequence is:

Volumes I–IV build the world; The Prisoner turns that world inward.

The narrator who once wanted to possess places, people, social status, art, and memorynow wants to possess another person’s inner life. Albertine becomes almost a laboratory in which Proust tests the same fundamental problem that has been haunting the whole Recherche: can we ever possess something we love, or even know it, without destroying or transforming it?

And The Prisoner is much more relentlessly focused on that one question than the preceding volumes are.

One caveat: if you’re reading a modern English edition, the translation itself can make a substantial difference to this impression. The posthumous volumes have particularly complicated textual histories; the original editors had to construct texts from manuscripts, typescripts and Proust’s late corrections, and there are significant differences among editions. 

The Penguin edition translation is probably part of what you’re noticing.

If you have the Penguin Modern Classics edition with Carol Clark’s translation of The Prisoner (the UK Penguin edition), you’re reading the newer Penguin translation, not the older Scott Moncrieff/Kilmartin version. Penguin explicitly describes Clark’s version as bringing out a “more sharply engaged, comic and lucid” Proust. 

That matters because Penguin’s series deliberately uses different translators for the different volumes:

• Swann’s Way — Lydia Davis
• Within a Budding Grove — James Grieve
• The Guermantes Way — Mark Treharne
• Sodom and Gomorrah — John Sturrock
• The Prisoner — Carol Clark
• The Fugitive — Peter Collier
• Time Regained — Ian Patterson 

So if you’ve read the preceding Penguin volumes, you’re experiencing both a change in Proust’s writing at this stage and a change in translator.

Clark’s Proust really is unusually readable

I wouldn’t dismiss your impression as simply “Volume V has an easier plot.” Clark’s translation is intentionally quite different in texture. Penguin’s description emphasizes its lucidity and comic quality, and contemporary commentary on the edition similarly remarked on its stylistic freshness. 

This is particularly appropriate for The Prisoner, because there is a lot more comic timing in the prose than one might initially remember from earlier Proust. Françoise, Albertine, the servants, the endless machinery of surveillance, Marcel’s absurd rationalizations—all of this is simultaneously psychologically serious and faintly ridiculous.

Clark allows that ridiculousness to register.

And there’s another subtle thing: Proust himself becomes more direct. The narrator’s obsession with Albertine gives the prose a kind of forward pressure. You aren’t merely being asked to contemplate a memory or decode a social environment. You’re continually asking:

What does Marcel think Albertine is doing, and is he right?

That makes even the digressions feel attached to a dramatic question.

The Prisoner was not simply “written before” the preceding volumes. The Albertine material was indeed conceived and drafted surprisingly early, but Proust repeatedly rewrote and expanded it, especially after the First World War. The text we have is therefore the result of a long process that overlaps the composition of almost the entire Recherche.

And the Penguin volume you’re possibly reading is particularly interesting because it reflects the modern textual reconstruction of that late Proust rather than merely reproducing the old English tradition. The Penguin edition is based on the later French textual scholarship and is presented as a new translation of the French text. 

So I’d put it this way:

You’re thusly probably finding The Prisoner easier for three reasons at once:

1. Proust has narrowed the dramatic focus enormously.
2. The Albertine story gives the book a continuous psychological narrative.
3. Carol Clark’s translation is deliberately more lucid and conversational than the older English Proust tradition.

The third point is especially worth remembering when you reach The Fugitive: Peter Collier is a different translator, so the English texture changes again even though you’re still in the Albertine story. 

One useful way to think about the Penguin Recherche is that the difficulty changes for two separate reasons: Proust’s subject matter and the translator’s English. They don’t always move in the same direction.

Here is how I’d characterize the seven volumes without spoiling anything beyond where you are.

Volume 1: four stars / accessible

Volume 2: three stars 

Volume 3: two stars 

Volume 4: three stars 

Volume 5 (Prisoner): four stars 

Volume 5 (Fugitive): three stars 

Volume 6: four stars 

Those stars aren’t a ranking of literary quality—just how much resistance I think a first-time English-language reader is likely to encounter.

The big hump is really III–IV

If you’ve made it through The Guermantes Way and Sodom and Gomorrah, you’ve already survived one of the hardest parts of the Recherche.

The Guermantes Way is difficult in a very particular way. Proust essentially makes French aristocratic society itself into a labyrinth. The difficulty isn’t just long sentences. You have to keep track of:

• who is related to whom;
• which title belongs to which person;
• who is considered socially superior;
• who is trying to enter which circle;
• what someone says versus what they actually mean;
• and, most importantly, what the narrator thinks he understands versus what he actually understands.

That’s cognitively demanding.

Then Sodom and Gomorrah adds another layer because Proust increasingly turns the novel into an investigation of sexual desire, secrecy, jealousy and interpretation. The narrator is becoming almost a detective of other people’s private lives.

And then you arrive at The Prisoner and suddenly:

There are fewer people to keep track of, fewer social worlds to decode, and one enormous psychological problem.

That’s an enormous reduction in cognitive load.

Why

The Prisoner

can feel almost like a different novel

There’s an interesting structural transformation.

In the earlier books, the narrator is constantly moving outward:

self → family → Combray → Paris → Balbec → aristocracy → artists → society

By The Prisoner, he is moving inward:

self → Albertine → jealousy → memory → desire → knowledge

The physical world becomes almost irrelevant.

And that’s why the book’s title is so clever even before you get to its deeper implications. The apparent prisoner is Albertine—but the narrator is also trapped by his own attempt to possess her.

This creates a kind of narrative feedback loop:

Albertine does X → Marcel interprets X → Marcel becomes suspicious → he questions Albertine → her answer produces another question → Marcel investigates → the investigation produces more uncertainty.

That’s much easier to follow narratively than Proust’s earlier social panoramas.

The irony is that the ideas haven’t necessarily become simpler. The narrative architecture has.

And Carol Clark matters quite a lot

This is something you can actually test for yourself.

Proust’s French can be extraordinarily syntactically elaborate, but there is also a great deal of lightness, irony and conversational comedy underneath it.

Some older English Proust can make him sound like a very solemn nineteenth-century philosopher.

Clark generally tries to let him sound more like someone who is thinking, remembering, teasing himself, and occasionally being ridiculous.

That’s particularly valuable in The Prisoner, because Marcel is frequently ridiculous.

He is:

• jealous;
• controlling;
• suspicious;
• self-deceiving;
• extraordinarily analytical;
• and simultaneously convinced that his analysis is getting him closer to the truth.

The comedy is therefore part of the characterization.

If the translation makes that irony audible, the book suddenly breathes.

The Fugitive

is a different experience

This is worth knowing before you get there.

Don’t necessarily expect:

The Prisoner → same thing, but more.

The Fugitive has a considerably more fragmentary and elegiac quality.

And there is a textual-history complication here that makes it particularly interesting. Proust was still radically revising these later volumes near the end of his life. The Fugitive was published posthumously, and the text we have isn’t a completely finalized work in the ordinary sense.

So if you occasionally think:

“This seems less tightly constructed than The Prisoner.”

—that isn’t necessarily your imagination.

There are genuine reasons for that.

Then something wonderful happens in

Time Regained

Without spoiling it: the final volume may be considerably easier than you expect.

After all the enormous accumulations of:

• people,
• places,
• social relationships,
• artistic discussions,
• romantic obsessions,
• historical events,
• memories,
• theories about memory,
• and theories about the theories of memory…

Proust starts bringing the pieces together.

The prose becomes surprisingly declarative.

It’s almost as if the novel has finally reached the point where Proust can say:

Now you understand what all this was for.

Not in a simplistic explanatory sense—the book remains unmistakably Proustian—but there is a powerful sense of retrospective illumination.

And this is one reason I wouldn’t worry too much about remembering every single detail of the earlier volumes.

Proust is not really asking you to memorize the Recherche.

He’s asking you to experience its accumulation.

Things you have almost forgotten can suddenly become meaningful again.

One thing I’d particularly recommend as you continue

Don’t try too hard to “solve” Proust.

This becomes especially tempting in The Prisoner, because Marcel is constantly trying to solve Albertine.

You may find yourself thinking:

Is Albertine telling the truth here?

Did she actually do X?

What exactly happened at Balbec?

What is Proust trying to establish about her sexuality?

Those are legitimate questions, but there’s another level at which the novel is doing something more interesting:

Marcel doesn’t have reliable access to another person’s interior life.

And neither do we.

The endless investigation therefore becomes part of the subject of the novel. Marcel’s uncertainty isn’t merely a puzzle Proust wants us to resolve. The uncertainty is the experience Proust wants us to inhabit.

That’s why The Prisoner can simultaneously feel easier to read and increasingly psychologically profound.

One last thing about the Penguin sequence

If you’re reading the seven Penguin volumes consecutively, I’d actually expect your experience to look roughly like this:

I — “This is beautiful, but what’s going on?”
II — “I’m beginning to understand the world.”
III — “There are an astonishing number of people and titles.”
IV — “I understand what Proust is doing, but this is psychologically intense.”
V — “Oh, suddenly I can just read this.”
VI — “This is beautiful, but something has changed.”
VII — “Oh. Now I see what the whole enormous thing has been doing.”

And that last experience is one of the great pleasures of reading the Recherche straight through.

If you’re currently in The Prisoner, I would definitely not rush it. It is one of the volumes where Proust’s obsessive repetitions start becoming particularly rewarding, because you can see the narrator simultaneously analyzing Albertine and exposing the mechanisms of his own analysis.

— Adam Donaldson Powell