osoparavos.com

Marcel Proust’s great novel presents an unusual problem before the reader has even opened its first page: what should the book be called? In French, the answer seems straightforward—À la recherche du temps perdu. Yet the history of the novel’s titles, both in French and in translation, reveals much about Proust’s conception of time, memory, art, and literary form. The English-speaking world first encountered the work under the evocative title Remembrance of Things Past, while later translators increasingly preferred the more literal In Search of Lost Time. The individual volumes have undergone an equally fascinating series of transformations. Changes such as Within a Budding Grove becoming In the Shadow of Young Girls in Flower, or Cities of the Plain becoming Sodom and Gomorrah, are not merely cosmetic. They alter the associations and expectations through which readers encounter Proust’s world.

The original French title, À la recherche du temps perdu, can be translated rather literally as “In Search of Lost Time” or “In Search of Time Lost.” The important word is recherche: it suggests a quest, investigation, or sustained act of seeking. Proust’s narrator does not simply remember the past. He gradually discovers how the past survives in the present and how art can recover experiences that seemed irretrievably lost. The title therefore describes both the subject and the structure of the novel. The narrator is searching for lost time, but the reader is also participating in that search.

The phrase “lost time” itself is ambiguous. It can mean time that has passed, but it can also suggest time wasted: the years spent in social ambition, jealousy, erotic obsession, or other pursuits that initially appear to have no lasting value. By the end of the novel, however, the distinction between wasted time and recovered time becomes unstable. Experiences that seemed useless may become the raw material of artistic understanding. The final volume, Le Temps retrouvé, literally “Time Regained” or “Time Recovered,” completes the movement announced by the original title. The novel begins with a search and ends with a recovery.

Proust’s published work was not always conceived in precisely the form familiar to readers today. The manuscripts and drafts preserved by the Bibliothèque nationale de France reveal a complicated process of composition, revision, and rearrangement. The eventual seven-volume structure developed over many years, and the individual titles changed as Proust continued to reshape the work. The French titles of the volumes are themselves carefully interconnected. Du côté de chez Swann and Le Côté de Guermantes, for example, establish two “sides” or directions associated with different families and social worlds. The BnF’s digital archive documents the successive manuscripts, proofs, corrections, and editions of these volumes. (Gallica⁠)

The first volume, Du côté de chez Swann, is usually known in English as Swann’s Way. The French phrase is not quite equivalent to “Swann’s Way.” Du côté de chez Swann means something closer to “on Swann’s side,” “by Swann’s,” or “in the direction of Swann’s.” The title refers quite literally to the walks taken by the narrator’s family at Combray, one route leading toward the Swann property and another toward the Guermantes estate. But “side” also has social and psychological implications: the two routes become alternative worlds, each associated with different desires and fantasies. Swann’s Way is elegant and memorable, but it suppresses some of this ambiguity.

The second volume, À l’ombre des jeunes filles en fleurs, has generated an even more conspicuous difference between translations. Scott Moncrieff called it Within a Budding Grove. The later Penguin translation associated with Christopher Prendergast uses In the Shadow of Young Girls in Flower. The latter follows the French more closely: à l’ombre is literally “in the shadow,” while jeunes filles en fleurs means “young girls in flower.” The difference matters because Proust’s title is deliberately strange and poetic. It evokes youth as a temporary flowering, while “shadow” introduces the sense of transience and desire that runs through the volume. Within a Budding Grove is beautiful English, but it turns the title into a more conventional pastoral image. (University Library⁠)

The third volume, Le Côté de Guermantes, presents a problem parallel to that of Du côté de chez Swann. Scott Moncrieff’s The Guermantes Way is concise and has become firmly established in English Proust scholarship. Yet, as with Swann’s Way, “way” does not reproduce the full range of côté. The title refers not simply to a road but to a side, direction, social sphere, and imagined destination. Proust’s geography gradually becomes a geography of desire: the narrator’s childhood fascination with the aristocratic Guermantes family turns physical distance into social and erotic distance.

The fourth volume illustrates an even more dramatic case of translation and editorial history. Sodome et Gomorrhe was rendered by Scott Moncrieff as Cities of the Plain. This is an allusive translation: rather than naming Sodom and Gomorrah directly, it evokes the biblical cities through a phrase associated with them. Later editions restored the more direct Sodom and Gomorrah. The change is significant because the biblical names carry an immediate cultural and theological resonance, while Cities of the Plain is comparatively indirect. The later title also makes clearer the volume’s explicit treatment of homosexuality, sexuality, secrecy, and social judgment.

The final three volumes are particularly complicated because Proust died in 1922 before the publication of all of them. La Prisonnière became The Captive; Albertine disparue became The Fugitive; and Le Temps retrouvé became Time Regained. The sixth volume has an especially tangled history. Albertine disparue—literally “Albertine Gone” or “Albertine Disappeared”—was also published under the alternative French title La Fugitive. Scott Moncrieff’s The Sweet Cheat Gone is perhaps the most famous example of the freedom taken by the early English translation. The phrase comes from Shakespeare’s Cymbeline, giving the volume a distinctly English literary coloring that is absent from Proust’s original title. Later translations generally move toward The Fugitive or Albertine Gone. The BnF records both Albertine disparue and La Fugitive as titles associated with the French volume. (Gallica⁠)

The history of the complete English title begins with C. K. Scott Moncrieff. His translation appeared between 1922 and 1931, and he chose Remembrance of Things Past for the work as a whole. This was not a literal translation of À la recherche du temps perdu. Instead, it alludes to Shakespeare’s Sonnet 30, with its famous phrase “When to the sessions of sweet silent thought / I summon up remembrance of things past.” The Shakespearean association is perfectly appropriate to Proust’s concern with memory, but it also transforms the emphasis of the French. Remembrance of Things Past makes the novel sound primarily retrospective; In Search of Lost Time stresses movement, investigation, and recovery.

For many decades, however, Remembrance of Things Past was the standard English name. Proust entered the English-speaking world through Moncrieff’s extraordinarily influential prose, and his title became inseparable from the novel’s English identity. The later history of the title therefore involves not simply correction but a shift in interpretation. By the twentieth century, translators and editors increasingly regarded In Search of Lost Time as a more faithful rendering of the French. The Modern Library edition revised by D. J. Enright in 1992 adopted that title, and it subsequently became the dominant English form. (PenguinRandomhouse.com⁠)

The change from Remembrance of Things Past to In Search of Lost Time also reflects changing ideas about translation itself. Moncrieff was not attempting a word-for-word rendering. His translation belongs to a period when translators often sought to recreate a foreign author’s literary effect in the idiom of English literature. His Shakespearean title is therefore an act of literary naturalization: Proust is brought into English through Shakespeare.

Later translators have tended to place greater emphasis on preserving the conceptual and structural relationships among Proust’s titles. The contrast between Swann’s Way and The Guermantes Way, for example, becomes more meaningful when one recognizes the parallelism of the French Du côté de chez Swann and Le Côté de Guermantes. Likewise, restoring Sodom and Gomorrah makes the biblical framework unmistakable, while In the Shadow of Young Girls in Flower preserves the peculiar imagery of the French original.

The 1980s and 1990s produced an important intermediate stage. Terence Kilmartin revised Moncrieff’s translation, modernizing vocabulary and correcting numerous problems while retaining much of Moncrieff’s literary character. D. J. Enright subsequently revised the Kilmartin version. The resulting edition, published in 1992, was based on the new French Pléiade text, whose four-volume edition appeared under the general direction of Jean-Yves Tadié between 1987 and 1989. The result was therefore not simply a stylistic modernization but an attempt to bring the English text into closer conformity with improved French scholarship. (PenguinRandomhouse.com⁠)

The next major development was the Penguin translation project. Lydia Davis translated Swann’s Way, published in 2004, using the title Swann’s Way but explicitly presenting the complete work as In Search of Lost Time, volume 1 The Way by Swann’s. Other translators then produced the remaining volumes, creating a collaborative English version rather than a single-translator rendering. Penguin’s edition describes Davis’s Swann’s Way as part of its new presentation of Proust’s masterpiece and emphasizes that the project was intended to bring the work to new readers. (PenguinRandomhouse.com⁠)

Another important modern development is William C. Carter’s continuing revision of Scott Moncrieff’s translation for Yale University Press. Rather than abandoning Moncrieff altogether, Carter’s edition attempts to preserve the historical translator’s distinctive voice while correcting and updating the text. This approach recognizes an important fact about literary translation: an old translation can itself become part of literary history. Moncrieff’s Proust is not simply an imperfect substitute for the French Proust. It is also the Proust who shaped the reception of the novel in English.

The title Remembrance of Things Past consequently remains culturally powerful even though In Search of Lost Time is now generally preferred as the English equivalent of À la recherche du temps perdu. The older title emphasizes memory; the newer one emphasizes quest. Neither is wholly wrong. Indeed, the tension between them captures something fundamental about Proust’s novel. The narrator discovers the past precisely by searching for it, but what he finally recovers is not a simple record of what happened. Memory transforms the past, and art gives it a new existence.

The changing titles of the individual volumes reveal the same tension between fidelity and literary invention. Swann’s Way is less literal than By Swann’s, but it has become an established English literary phrase. Within a Budding Grove is more freely poetic than In the Shadow of Young Girls in Flower. Cities of the Plain is more indirect than Sodom and Gomorrah. The Sweet Cheat Gone is strikingly Shakespearean, while Albertine Gone or The Fugitive stays closer to the French. These differences show that translation is never simply a matter of replacing one word with another. A title establishes the atmosphere, cultural associations, and interpretive framework of an entire volume.

Ultimately, the history of Proust’s titles is almost a miniature version of the novel’s own theory of time. Titles are repeatedly lost, recovered, revised, and reinterpreted. A title that once seemed natural can later appear misleading; an older formulation can then return in a new edition with a different significance. Even the French text has its own history of revision and posthumous editorial reconstruction. The novel that English readers call In Search of Lost Time has therefore never existed in English under one completely stable name.

This instability is fitting. Proust’s subject is the impossibility of preserving experience unchanged. Time alters everything: people, places, memories, meanings, and even the words by which we name them. Translation makes this process visible. Remembrance of Things Past and In Search of Lost Time are not merely two labels for the same book. They are two interpretations of what the book is doing. The former foregrounds remembrance; the latter foregrounds the search that makes remembrance possible. Between them lies the central paradox of Proust’s art: what is lost in time may be recovered, but only by being transformed into something new.

— Adam Donaldson Powell & AI